An Operating Agreement is the foundational governance document of a limited liability company (LLC). It serves as both a contract among the members and an internal constitution governing the management, economic rights, and operational mechanics of the entity. Although not always required by statute, an Operating Agreement is universally regarded as the principal source of authority for member rights and company governance, superseding default provisions of applicable LLC acts where permitted by law.
The primary purpose of an Operating Agreement is to:
A well-drafted Operating Agreement generally includes the following sections:
Operating Agreements derive their authority from state LLC statutes, for example, the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, 6 Del. C. §18-101 et seq. These statutes provide broad contractual flexibility, permitting members to customize governance and economic arrangements, subject only to limited non-waivable provisions such as the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Courts generally enforce the Operating Agreement according to its terms, reflecting the freedom-of-contract principle underpinning modern LLC law.
An Operating Agreement functions analogously to corporate bylaws and shareholders’ agreements for corporations, and to partnership agreements for partnerships. However, LLCs combine corporate limited liability with partnership-style tax treatment and operational flexibility, making the Operating Agreement a hybrid instrument that simultaneously governs both entity structure and contractual relations among members.
An Operating Agreement is the central legal document governing an LLC’s existence, management, and economics. In sophisticated practice such as private equity, venture capital, or joint ventures, it is often a heavily negotiated instrument balancing control, capital protection, and exit rights among investors. Proper drafting ensures that the LLC operates predictably and that its members’ intentions are enforceable under applicable law.
Here is how experienced transactional lawyers review an Operating Agreement with structure, precision, and commercial judgment. This framework applies whether you represent investors, founders, or management.
Before reviewing the agreement line by line, begin by understanding the context.
Understanding these factors helps you interpret the agreement strategically, not mechanically.
Instead of reading from top to bottom, review the agreement in layers, focusing on one category of issues at a time.
Do not review the Operating Agreement in isolation. Compare it to related deal documents such as:
When providing feedback, focus on clarity and priority.
After your review, prepare a short issues summary or cover memo.
The goal is to make the client’s position clear and actionable.
Approach every Operating Agreement review with three layers of focus.
By applying precision, commercial awareness, and strategic thinking, you can transform a complex LLC Operating Agreement into a clear, enforceable, and balanced document that protects your client’s interests.
Even for experienced lawyers, reviewing an Operating Agreement is time-consuming work. The document is long, repetitive, and filled with cross-references that demand careful attention. Missing a single definition or misreading a voting threshold can have real financial and control consequences. That’s why many professionals now use AI-assisted tools like goHeather contract review AI tool to handle the first pass.
goHeather is an AI contract review platform trained on real legal reasoning. It reads Operating Agreements the way a lawyer would, identifying control provisions, economic terms, and risk allocations, and summarizes the key findings in plain language.
When you upload an agreement, goHeather instantly highlights:
The platform doesn’t replace a lawyer’s judgment, but it makes the process dramatically faster. You can get an organized list of red-flag clauses, confirm that the economics align with the model, and understand which sections need closer human review.
For lawyers, goHeather becomes a way to triage dense documents before a full mark-up. For founders, investors, and business owners, it’s a practical way to understand what they are signing before engaging counsel. The AI’s checklist and explanations serve as a roadmap for the next layer of legal review.
By combining a professional’s expertise with goHeather’s intelligent first pass, you can review an Operating Agreement more efficiently, more accurately, and with a clearer picture of where the risks actually lie.
Suppose you are forming or investing in a limited liability company and need to review the Operating Agreement. Traditionally, this process can take days, involving detailed checks of definitions, capital schedules, and voting rights. With goHeather, an AI trained by lawyers, a thorough first-pass review can be completed in minutes with clear feedback and suggested revisions.
Step 1: Upload Your Operating Agreement and Define Parameters
Upload your Operating Agreement in either PDF or Word format to the secure goHeather platform. You can also begin the review directly from Microsoft Word using the goHeather Add-In. During setup, specify the governing law jurisdiction and indicate your role, such as majority owner, minority investor, or manager, so the AI tailors its analysis to your position.
Step 2: AI Analysis and Risk Assessment
goHeather’s lawyer-trained AI uses Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning to convert complex legal text into structured data and assess it against key governance and economic standards.
Step 3: Make Informed Decisions and Finalize
After the analysis, you can refine and finalize the document using goHeather’s guidance.
This process provides a quick and accurate first-pass review, allowing lawyers, founders, and investors to focus on strategy rather than manual document review.
High Risk: Unilateral Manager Control
Original: “The Manager shall have full and exclusive authority to act for the Company without the consent of any Member.”
AI Insight: Complete control without oversight creates governance risk.
Suggested Fix: “The Manager shall manage daily operations, subject to Member approval for major actions such as borrowing, mergers, or amendments to this Agreement.”
Medium Risk: Missing Tax Distribution Clause
Original: The document contains no provision for tax distributions.
AI Insight: Members could owe tax on allocated income without receiving funds.
Suggested Fix: “The Company shall make tax distributions sufficient to cover members’ estimated tax liabilities resulting from Company income.”
Jeff Dutton is a lawyer who advises on technology, corporate, privacy, commercial, employment and real estate law.
Jeff founded his own small law firm, Dutton Law, in 2016 (and merged it with a larger firm in 2019). Before that, Jeff was a prosecutor and a commercial law lawyer at a national boutique law firm.
Jeffrey is a frequent lecturer on legal matters and has been published in newspapers and trade journals. In addition, Jeff was the editor and co-author of a leading employment law text for lawyers for many years.
Education:
Western University, BA (2009)
University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law, JD (2012)
Get the latest contract tips, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox. Subscribe now and never miss out on what's new in contract law or at goHeather!
Our AI sifts through each clause, identifying potential risks. This enables us to provide quick yet comprehensive contract reviews, equipping you with the legal information you need to make informed decisions.
goHeather enables you to quickly create local employment contracts using lawyer-made templates. Our contracts include a free e-signature feature and provide access to a dashboard for managing all your employee contracts and key details.